Hello! You're looking at a policy document report on Overton
We track government policy, guidelines, think tank research, working papers and more to help our customers see the impact and influence of their work. Are you interested in seeing what information we have to offer? Request a free trial to our platform.
If you fund, produce or manage research or work to influence policy, we'd love to talk. Learn more on our homepage.
Identifiers
Overton ID
unenvironment-250ccb5b11795e74a5ac3cd45a24f0e9
Lenders and Investors Environmental Liability: How Much is Too Much?
This working paper presents an overview of Lender Environmental Liability (LEL) and Investor Environmental Liability (IEL) regimes and issues. Environmental harm and degradation is often irreparable. Therefore, our assumption is that precaution is the main objective of any international and domestic environmental legal regime. The paper explores the conditions under which LEL/IEL can be effective tool to promote precaution. To illustrate our premise, we created a model based on Nash’s game theory in an attempt to universalize some basic concepts in the design of these systems. By using Nash’s game theory we aim to answer the question presented in the title of our paper: how much is too much environmental liability for a financial institution to bear? We argue that full environmental liability (where financial institutions bear unlimited liability) may have the perverse effect of incentivising them to internalize any duty of care, in case they bear full liability. - See more at: http://unepinquiry.org/p...
Topics in this document
Equity (finance)
Nash equilibrium
Investment
Legal liability
Duty of care
Investment fund
Economy
Policy
Bank
Risk management
Law
Economic equilibrium
Environmental impact assessment
Game theory
Finance
Private equity
Superfund
Negligence
Risk
Interest
Loan
Strategy (game theory)
Due diligence
Contract
Stock
Credit
Climate change
Pollution
National Environmental Policy Act
Risk assessment
Citations
Cited by 8
other policy documents
(2 of them are from other policy sources)